Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mokhachane I (h)"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Two issues with this and the (d) page, first off is (h) and (d) the best way to show the difference? I'm pretty sure we can't just have two pages with the same name, but perhaps spelling it out in full, i.e. Mokhachane I; Human Incarnation would be better? Though that style suggest that the wiki agrees re-incarnation has taken place. The article should probably make reference to the belief and definitely link to a fuller explanation. Secondly, should we be putting stuff like "may be based?" The idea after all is to write the wiki as if we were talking about actual historical figures, not a work of fiction. Apart from that, it's good to see new pages going up. [[User:Andrew|Andrew]] 14:29, 12 November 2007 (PST) | Two issues with this and the (d) page, first off is (h) and (d) the best way to show the difference? I'm pretty sure we can't just have two pages with the same name, but perhaps spelling it out in full, i.e. Mokhachane I; Human Incarnation would be better? Though that style suggest that the wiki agrees re-incarnation has taken place. The article should probably make reference to the belief and definitely link to a fuller explanation. Secondly, should we be putting stuff like "may be based?" The idea after all is to write the wiki as if we were talking about actual historical figures, not a work of fiction. Apart from that, it's good to see new pages going up. [[User:Andrew|Andrew]] 14:29, 12 November 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As for the (d) & (h) I'm simply following the style of the appendix at the end of EOI. An explanation or a reference will make things clearer, I'll take care of it in the future. You're right about the "may be based", I'll fix it. | ||
| + | [[User:Natli|Natli]] 01:12, 13 November 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I didn't notice/remember that style at the end of Empire, my bad and well spotted. [[User:Andrew|Andrew]] 03:21, 13 November 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:21, 13 November 2007
Two issues with this and the (d) page, first off is (h) and (d) the best way to show the difference? I'm pretty sure we can't just have two pages with the same name, but perhaps spelling it out in full, i.e. Mokhachane I; Human Incarnation would be better? Though that style suggest that the wiki agrees re-incarnation has taken place. The article should probably make reference to the belief and definitely link to a fuller explanation. Secondly, should we be putting stuff like "may be based?" The idea after all is to write the wiki as if we were talking about actual historical figures, not a work of fiction. Apart from that, it's good to see new pages going up. Andrew 14:29, 12 November 2007 (PST)
As for the (d) & (h) I'm simply following the style of the appendix at the end of EOI. An explanation or a reference will make things clearer, I'll take care of it in the future. You're right about the "may be based", I'll fix it. Natli 01:12, 13 November 2007 (PST)
I didn't notice/remember that style at the end of Empire, my bad and well spotted. Andrew 03:21, 13 November 2007 (PST)
