Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wombat1138"
Wombat1138 (talk | contribs) |
Strangerface (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
...there might also be some issues about whether the Jiaqing Emperor would've been properly referred to as such during his life. In modern Japanese usage, at least, the reign name is only used to refer to previous emperors; during the reign, the emperor is simply referred to with a title that means "the current emperor". On the other hand, as with the Wade-Giles/pinyin issue, it's possible to handwave a lot of slips as being filtered through Laurence's imperfect understanding of Chinese customs/language. (This gets more difficult for sections narrated from Temeraire's POV, but hey.) --[[User:Wombat1138|Wombat1138]] 11:54, 18 August 2010 (PDT) | ...there might also be some issues about whether the Jiaqing Emperor would've been properly referred to as such during his life. In modern Japanese usage, at least, the reign name is only used to refer to previous emperors; during the reign, the emperor is simply referred to with a title that means "the current emperor". On the other hand, as with the Wade-Giles/pinyin issue, it's possible to handwave a lot of slips as being filtered through Laurence's imperfect understanding of Chinese customs/language. (This gets more difficult for sections narrated from Temeraire's POV, but hey.) --[[User:Wombat1138|Wombat1138]] 11:54, 18 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I tend to agree with you. But we're just running around in circles in speculation. It's too bad we can't ask NN a bunch of questions just for the wiki. (Can we?) The Celestial family three would definitely be one I'd ask. -- [[User:Strangerface|Strangerface]] 18:29, 18 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:29, 19 August 2010
"Grandfather", Celestials, and the Ming/Qing dynasties
There could be an entire generation/branch of Celestials missing if some of them went with the "Southern Ming Dynasty". Heck, for all we know, "Grandfather" was bonded to the Chongzhen Emperor (1611-1644) and stayed with him in Beijing while the other Ming princes fled with all of the other living Celestials and their eggs, leaving behind only the Celestial eggs carried but not yet laid by Imperial females.
Chongzhen killed all of his daughters except one, and all of Chongzhen's sons seem to've died/disappeared. This leaves plenty of questions about what might've happened to their dragons, if any. The first Southern Ming claimant, the "Hongguang Emperor", was Chongzhen's nephew; it looks like the subsequent Southern Ming claimants were more distant relatives, but still collaterally related to the Ming imperial family.
...there might also be some issues about whether the Jiaqing Emperor would've been properly referred to as such during his life. In modern Japanese usage, at least, the reign name is only used to refer to previous emperors; during the reign, the emperor is simply referred to with a title that means "the current emperor". On the other hand, as with the Wade-Giles/pinyin issue, it's possible to handwave a lot of slips as being filtered through Laurence's imperfect understanding of Chinese customs/language. (This gets more difficult for sections narrated from Temeraire's POV, but hey.) --Wombat1138 11:54, 18 August 2010 (PDT)
I tend to agree with you. But we're just running around in circles in speculation. It's too bad we can't ask NN a bunch of questions just for the wiki. (Can we?) The Celestial family three would definitely be one I'd ask. -- Strangerface 18:29, 18 August 2010 (PDT)
